These are among the most serious charges North Carolina and the federal government bring. They move fast once devices are seized and forensic examiners get involved. We take them on directly, in the Wake County and Durham County Superior Courts, and in the federal Eastern and Middle Districts of North Carolina. We build the defense around what the government can actually prove, not the label on the charge. What follows is a plain explanation of the charges the firm defends and how we approach each one.
State and Federal Charges We Defend
First-Degree Sexual Exploitation of a Minor
We represent clients facing first-degree sexual exploitation of a minor. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-190.16, this charge covers using, employing, inducing, coercing, or facilitating a minor to engage in sexual activity for a live or recorded performance, or producing, or profiting from, material that depicts it. It is the most serious of the three degrees: a Class C felony. For the newer prongs (material modified to appear that an identifiable minor is involved, and child sex dolls) it is a Class D felony. In North Carolina, first-degree sexual exploitation of a minor is a Class C felony with a presumptive minimum sentence of 58 to 73 months at the lowest prior record level. Exposure rises sharply with prior record level and aggravating findings.The statute is built so that mistake of age is not a defense, and the judge or jury may infer that a depicted person is a minor. Production carries the heaviest exposure in this area. For that reason, we focus on what the State must prove: that you acted "knowing the content and character of the material," your actual role in any alleged production, identity, and, for a modified-image or child-sex-doll count, whether the depiction is of a real, identifiable minor at all.
Second-Degree Sexual Exploitation of a Minor
We represent clients facing second-degree sexual exploitation of a minor. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-190.17, this charge reaches recording, photographing, filming, developing, or duplicating child sexual abuse material, along with the distribution side: transporting, exhibiting, receiving, selling, purchasing, exchanging, or soliciting it. It is a Class E felony, and mistake of age is again unavailable as a defense.Distribution charges frequently turn on how files moved across a network or a peer-to-peer program and whether the person actually knew what they were sharing. We examine the knowledge element closely, along with the forensic basis for any claim that you distributed rather than merely possessed material. That distinction changes the offense class and, in federal court, triggers a mandatory minimum.
Third-Degree Sexual Exploitation of a Minor
We represent clients facing third-degree sexual exploitation of a minor. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-190.17A, this charge criminalizes knowing possession of material depicting a minor in sexual activity. It is a Class H felony. The critical feature of these cases is how they are counted: North Carolina treats each image as a separate visual depiction (State v. Howell, 169 N.C. App. 58 (2005)). As a result, a single hard drive can generate many counts, and those counts can be stacked.The decisive issues are knowledge and possession or control of the specific files. Automatic caching, shared devices, and unopened downloads all bear directly on whether possession was "knowing." We scrutinize the forensic report, the chain of custody, and how the files came to be on the device before conceding that anyone knowingly possessed anything.
AI-Generated Images, "Deepfakes," and Child Sex Dolls
We represent clients facing the newest category of sexual-exploitation charges. North Carolina added them when it amended § 14-190.16, § 14-190.17, and § 14-190.17A in 2024 (S.L. 2024-37) to reach material created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaged in sexual activity, along with child sex dolls modeled on an identifiable minor. These prongs run through all three degrees.This area has a genuine constitutional line. In Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002), the U.S. Supreme Court held that wholly virtual material that records no crime and creates no victim in its production is protected speech. North Carolina's statutes reach only depictions of a real, identifiable minor. For any modified-image count, we examine whether the government can actually tie the depiction to an identifiable child, or whether it falls on the protected side of that line.
Federal Child Exploitation Charges in the Eastern and Middle Districts
We represent clients facing federal charges for the same conduct, which is often prosecuted more harshly than in state court. Production under 18 U.S.C. § 2251 carries a 15-year mandatory minimum. Receipt and distribution under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A carry a 5-year minimum. Possession carries up to 10 years, or up to 20 if the material depicts a child under 12. Federal jurisdiction rests on an interstate-commerce requirement, and there is effectively no statute of limitations for these offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 3299.The federal numbers show why early, experienced counsel matters. Federal prosecutions in this area have grown year over year, and sentences routinely run a decade or more once mandatory minimums apply. Detention is a live issue from day one: most federal defendants in these cases are held until the case ends. Federal sex offenses carry a rebuttable presumption of detention under 18 U.S.C. § 3142.
In federal cases we contest the commerce and knowledge elements and the "purpose" element in production cases (United States v. Palomino-Coronado, 805 F.3d 127 (4th Cir. 2015)). At the same time, we candidly advise clients that the "no real child" and time-bar arguments that seem obvious are ruled out.
Why Should You Choose Our Firm?
Federal sexual-abuse cases go to trial far more often than the average federal case. In North Carolina state court, 98% of felony convictions analyzed for disposition method came by guilty plea and only 2% by jury trial in fiscal year 2024. You want a lawyer who is genuinely prepared to try the case and knows how the other side evaluates it.What Happens When You Contact the Firm?
Your first conversation with us is a confidential consultation. We will ask what has happened so far: whether officers have called, executed a search warrant, seized devices, requested an interview, or filed charges. Then we will explain, in plain terms, where your situation stands and what is likely to come next. There is no benefit to you in facing questions from investigators alone. One of the most important early steps is often simply making sure the government hears from your lawyer rather than from you.From there, the firm works to get ahead of the case. In these prosecutions the evidence is largely digital, so we move early to understand what was seized, how it was searched, and what the forensic examination actually shows. How that evidence was obtained can shape the entire case. We will identify the real exposure across state and federal law and explain the consequences of a conviction honestly. We will also lay out the realistic paths forward, whether that is contesting the charges, challenging the search, negotiating from a position of strength, or preparing the case for trial. You will know what the firm is doing and why at each stage.
We handle these cases in Raleigh and throughout Wake County, in Durham, Chapel Hill, and Cary, and in the surrounding areas, in both the North Carolina courts and the federal Eastern and Middle Districts.
Strategic Defense for Serious Sexual Offense Allegations
When facing charges as grave as the sexual exploitation of a minor, the quality of your legal counsel is the most critical factor in your defense. Attorney Patrick Roberts brings over two decades of courtroom experience, with a practice specifically focused on sex crime defense and the complexities of high-stakes criminal litigation. A former Assistant District Attorney who has handled more than 250 felony sex crime cases, Mr. Roberts possesses the deep subject-matter expertise required to dissect the government’s digital forensic evidence, challenge the burden of proof, and navigate the intricate landscape of both state and federal jurisdictions. Consistently rated AV Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell and recognized as a peer-consulted strategist within the North Carolina bar, Mr. Roberts offers a rigorous, data-driven defense strategy designed to protect the rights and futures of those navigating the most challenging legal circumstances.• AV Preeminent Rating: Consistently recognized by Martindale-Hubbell with this peer-nominated credential for professional excellence and high ethical standards from 2018 through 2026.
• National Association of Distinguished Counsel: Repeatedly selected for the "Nation's Top 1 Percent" designation in multiple years, including 2025 and 2026.
• Duke University School of Law Alumnus: Earned a Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree in 2000, providing a foundation for his advanced criminal litigation and defense career.
• Former Prosecutor Perspective: Served as an Assistant District Attorney across three North Carolina counties, including specialized roles as a juvenile sex crimes prosecutor and felony drug prosecutor.
• Expertise in Digital Forensic Evidence: Completed specialized training programs such as the "Defending Digital Sex Crimes Bootcamp" (2026) to manage the complexities of electronic evidence and digital forensics.
• Published Author on Electronic Evidence: Co-authored *Strategies for Defending Internet Pornography Cases*, a legal text focused on analyzing electronic documents and explaining technological evidence in court.
Client Review
...Patrick and his team double-check their knowledge of the law so that their courtroom presentation is well organized and flawless. Patrick knows how important it is to present your case effectively... Patrick is VERY upfront and honest. Your privacy is a priority.— Review by a verified client via Avvo
Peer Endorsement
I endorse this lawyer's work. I have known A. Patrick Roberts for 5 years. He has always been very professional and very highly regarded in the criminal defense community. I have gotten to know Patrick over the years and come to highly respect him as a friend and an attorney.— Peer endorsement by a fellow North Carolina trial attorney via Avvo
Disclaimer: The client reviews and peer endorsements displayed are authentic testimonials and comments provided by clients and fellow attorneys. Every case is unique and must be evaluated individually; past client experiences and case results do not guarantee, promise, or predict similar outcomes in any future matter.
Case Results
When choosing legal representation, you have every right to look closely at what an attorney has actually accomplished for past clients. Here is a look at real case results handled by Attorney Patrick Roberts:• Investigation Into Child Sexual Abuse Material: Law enforcement investigated an individual regarding the alleged download of child sexual abuse material linked to their IP address. Following the seizure of evidence and a confession, criminal defense attorney Patrick Roberts negotiated with the District Attorney to present mitigating factors, resulting in a probationary sentence rather than incarceration.
â—‹ Outcome: Probation; the client received a probationary sentence with permission to transfer supervision to another state.
• Second-Degree Exploitation of a Child Allegations: An individual faced two counts of second-degree exploitation of a minor related to internet communications. Mr. Roberts gathered psychological records and expert evaluations to negotiate a resolution, successfully avoiding felony convictions, incarceration, and sex offender registration requirements.
â—‹ Outcome: Plea to two misdemeanors with probation; the client avoided prison, felony status, and sex offender registration.
• Online Child Exploitation Charges: An individual was charged with two counts of second-degree exploitation of a minor involving online photo exchanges and communications. By conducting a psychological history investigation and presenting expert testimony to prosecutors, counsel secured a plea agreement that avoided prison and sex offender registry mandates.
â—‹ Outcome: Plea to two misdemeanors with probation; the client avoided prison, felony status, and sex offender registration.
• Child Pornography Investigation and Related Misdemeanors: An individual was investigated for possession of child pornography and separately charged with misdemeanor larceny and resisting a public officer. An independent defense investigation uncovered contradictory evidence, leading federal authorities to decline charges and the state to dismiss all remaining misdemeanor counts.
â—‹ Outcome: No charges filed; all misdemeanor charges dismissed.
Disclaimer: Case outcomes depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future legal matter.
Understanding Your Defense Options in Sexual Exploitation of a Minor Cases
Facing allegations involving the sexual exploitation of a minor requires an immediate, strategic, and informed legal defense. At Patrick Roberts Law PLLC, we provide dedicated representation for individuals navigating complex state and federal investigations. We understand the critical nuances of these charges—including forensic evidence, intent, and evidentiary standards—and we are prepared to challenge the government’s case at every stage to protect your rights and your future.Whether you are under investigation or facing formal charges, experienced counsel is essential. We represent clients throughout North Carolina, with a focused commitment to serving the Wake County community, including Raleigh, Cary, Apex, Holly Springs, Garner, and Fuquay-Varina. Do not navigate this process alone; contact us today to discuss your situation confidentially at www.patrickroberts.law.
Access our Sex Offense Search Tool to look up North Carolina laws, felony levels, sentencing guidelines, and mandatory registration rules. Find out how NC defense lawyer Patrick Roberts can assist with your case.
To maintain a high standard of service and thorough oversight for each client, we manage a restricted caseload
Disclaimer: This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. North Carolina expunction law is almost entirely statutory and subject to legislative change, and how these rules apply depends on the specific facts of your case. For guidance on your situation, consult a licensed North Carolina attorney.

